Sunday, July 24, 2016
Tuesday, July 19, 2016
Monday, July 18, 2016
Wednesday, July 13, 2016
Tuesday, July 12, 2016
Friday, July 08, 2016
Wednesday, July 06, 2016
Monday, July 04, 2016
Sunday, July 03, 2016
Tuesday, June 28, 2016
Monday, June 27, 2016
Thursday, June 23, 2016
Wednesday, June 22, 2016
Monday, June 20, 2016
Sunday, June 19, 2016
Saturday, June 18, 2016
Wednesday, June 15, 2016
Tuesday, June 14, 2016
Monday, June 13, 2016
Sunday, June 12, 2016
Saturday, June 11, 2016
Wednesday, June 08, 2016
Thursday, February 25, 2016
Monday, February 08, 2016
Thursday, November 19, 2015
Wednesday, November 18, 2015
Sunday, October 11, 2015
Tuesday, June 30, 2015
Thursday, June 18, 2015
Sunday, March 15, 2015
Sunday, January 11, 2015
Thursday, January 08, 2015
Wednesday, December 24, 2014
Tuesday, December 16, 2014
"Research wonders about aimlessly, each researcher seeing just one part of the infinite array of natural factors which affect harvest yields... Modern research divides nature into tiny pieces and conducts tests that confirm neither with natural law nor with practical experiences. The tesults are arranged for the convenience of research, not according to the needs of the farmer. To think that these conclusions can be put to use with invariable success in the farmer's girl is a big mistake."
Fragment taken from the book "The One-Straw Revolution" by MASANOBU FUKUOKA
(Thoughts on agriculture and the limits of the scientific method)
Wednesday, November 26, 2014
Tuesday, November 25, 2014
Monday, November 24, 2014
Sunday, November 23, 2014
Saturday, November 22, 2014
Wednesday, November 19, 2014
Tuesday, November 18, 2014
Monday, November 17, 2014
"In politics we have so firm a faith in the manifestly unknowable future that we are prepared to sacrifice millions of lives to an opium smoker's dream of Utopia or world dominion or perpetual security. But where natural resources are concerned, we sacrifice a pretty accurately predictable future to present greed. We know, for example, that if we abuse soil, it will lose its fertility, that if we massacre the forests, our children will lack timber and see their uplands eroded, their valleys swept by floods. Nevertheless we continue to abuse the soil and massacre the forests. In a word, we immolate the present to the future in those complex human affairs, where foresight is impossible; but in the relatively simple affairs of nature, where we know quite well what is likely to happen, we immolate the future to the present."
ALDOUS HUXLEY
(Fragment taken from the epilogue to his novel: "Time Must Have a Stop")
ALDOUS HUXLEY
(Fragment taken from the epilogue to his novel: "Time Must Have a Stop")
Friday, November 14, 2014
ALDOUS HUXLEY
(Fragment taken from the epilogue to his novel: "Time Must Have a Stop")
Wednesday, October 29, 2014
Tuesday, October 28, 2014
Saturday, October 18, 2014
Monday, October 06, 2014
Saturday, October 04, 2014
"A flawless, perfectly, digital ethical society would be too well drawn, and would not be good for individuals. A little noise, not too much, is needed if there is to be creativity or individuality.
The very idea of "digital" fights that necessary noise. Recall that the motivation of the invention of the bit was to hide and contain the thermal, chaotic aspect of physical reality for a time in order to have a circumscribed, temporary, programmable nook within the larger theater. Outside of the conceit of the computer, reality cannot be fully known or programmed.
Poorly conceived digital systems can erase the numinous nuances that make us individuals. The all-or-nothing nature of the bit is reflected at all layers in a digital information system, just like the quantum nature of elementary particles is reflected in the uncertainty of complex systems in macro physical reality, like the weather. If we associate human identity with the digital reduction instead of reality at large, we will reduce ourselves.
The all-or-nothing conceit of the bit should not be amplified to become the social principle of the human world, even though that's the lazy thing to do from an engineering point of view. It's equally mistaken to build digital culture, which is gradually becoming all culture, on a foundation of anonymity or single-persona antiprivacy. Both are similar affronts to personhood."
Fragment taken from the book: "You Are Not A Gadget" by Jaron Lanier.
(Thoughts on personhood and digital culture)
The very idea of "digital" fights that necessary noise. Recall that the motivation of the invention of the bit was to hide and contain the thermal, chaotic aspect of physical reality for a time in order to have a circumscribed, temporary, programmable nook within the larger theater. Outside of the conceit of the computer, reality cannot be fully known or programmed.
Poorly conceived digital systems can erase the numinous nuances that make us individuals. The all-or-nothing nature of the bit is reflected at all layers in a digital information system, just like the quantum nature of elementary particles is reflected in the uncertainty of complex systems in macro physical reality, like the weather. If we associate human identity with the digital reduction instead of reality at large, we will reduce ourselves.
The all-or-nothing conceit of the bit should not be amplified to become the social principle of the human world, even though that's the lazy thing to do from an engineering point of view. It's equally mistaken to build digital culture, which is gradually becoming all culture, on a foundation of anonymity or single-persona antiprivacy. Both are similar affronts to personhood."
Fragment taken from the book: "You Are Not A Gadget" by Jaron Lanier.
(Thoughts on personhood and digital culture)
Wednesday, September 17, 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



